Tip of an Iceberg

The Military Faces Accountability Issues in Dealing With Prisoner Abuse
By Brenna Rackham
It’s been said that people should believe only half of what
they see and nothing of what they read. After his experiences as a defense
witness in three of the seven Abu Ghraib abuse trials, sociology professor
Stjepan Mestrovic would likely agree.
During Saddam Hussein’s reign, Abu Ghraib was an infamous
prison near Baghdad
that housed prisoners in vile conditions and permitted torture and weekly
executions. After the regime collapsed, coalition forces converted the
structure into a U.S.
military prison. Americans were outraged when photos that seemed to document
the abuse of Iraqi prisoners by U.S.
soldiers were leaked to the public. These images brought a heightened level of
publicity to the trials of seven low-level Army soldiers.
Mestrovic, an authority on war crimes, particularly in the
Balkans area, had served as an expert witness in previous trials on war crimes.
Because of this experience and knowledge, defense attorneys asked him to
testify in three of the Abu Ghraib trials: for Javal Davis, Sabrina Harman and
Lynndie England.
He admits that after initially seeing the photographs, he did not want to
defend the soldiers in court. It wasn’t until he read more about the
circumstances involved and read the psychiatric reports that he agreed to
testify on the soldiers’ behalves, because the situation “was not what the
public thinks it was.”
Mestrovic says the photographs and stories were misleading
because they failed to expose the conditions and the context surrounding the
incidents, which he believes indicate that the military has a greater problem.
He testified that the soldiers’ deviation was inevitable
because of the “poisonous environment” at Abu Ghraib and the “social
disorganization” that left the soldiers with little supervision. He further
testified that officers at Abu Ghraib “knew or should have known what was going
on.”
Mestrovic believes that the abuse problem is a systemic
issue in the military’s command structure and that higher-ranking officials
need to take responsibility for their subordinates. “People blame these
so-called few rotten apples for what happened, but they’re not the problem,” he
says. “A big portion of the apple orchard is contaminated, and the orchard
keepers need to be held accountable.”
Organizations like Human Rights Watch, a nongovernmental
agency that investigates human rights issues, also recognize that there is a
problem, after receiving reports from West Point
graduate Capt. Ian Fishback. Cases of abuse were also documented at other bases
in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay.
Media coverage of the trials frustrated Mestrovic because he
thought that it fueled the public’s misunderstanding of the events that
occurred at the prison. He noticed that many reporters stayed in court just
long enough to gather information to create a sensational headline. This
approach, he says, led to unfair representations of the soldiers in the public
eye, particularly for Lynndie England,
who was one of the most recognized of the soldiers because of a photo in which
she held a leash tied to a prisoner. Testimony during the trial revealed that England
never yelled at or physically harmed any detainee and held the leash only under
orders.
In an effort to address the issues they think were ignored
in the trials, Mestrovic and his graduate assistant Ryan Ashley Caldwell began
conducting research for several new projects about the experience. Caldwell will focus her
graduate dissertation on the social and cultural implications of the events.
She will also aid Mestrovic in writing academic articles and book chapters, as
well as a book expected to be completed this year.
Mestrovic and Caldwell hope that they will encourage discussion and change. ‘“It’s a critique of a military system that can be helpful,” Caldwell says. “Best-case scenario, it could address these systemic problems and lead to policy changes to respect basic notions of human rights and how we treat prisoners.”
