Tracking System
![]()
Doctoral students
design online mapping system for tracking sex offenders
By Judith McIntosh White
A team from Texas A&M University’s
College of Architecture is developing computerized
mapping techniques to help police track locations and estimate risk-levels for
registered sex offenders.
“We have created a spatial planning tool that law
enforcement officers can use to locate sex offenders living in off-limits child
safety zones,” says Praveen Maghelal, doctoral student in planning in the
Department of Landscape Architecture and Urban Planning. “Geographic
information systems (GIS) technology provides a powerful means to map the
addresses of such offenders and relate these locations to critical areas where
children frequently gather.”
“The system also is expected to help authorities provide
timely proximity information about sex offenders living near the site of a
child’s disappearance, thus potentially contributing to quick solutions to such
crimes,” adds partner Miriam Olivares, also a doctoral student in planning.
Federal laws, such as the Sexually Violent Offenders
Registration Act of 1994 and the 1996 Megan’s Law, require those convicted of
sexual crimes to register their places of residence with local law enforcement
agencies, which then notify others residing in the neighborhood (within three
blocks for subdivisions and within a one-mile radius for non-subdivided land)
of the offender’s presence. Most states also designate child safety zones near
which offenders may not live, such as around daycare providers and schools.
Tracking such offenders has proven difficult, however, due
to their mobility and to the fact that the size of child safety zones varies
between different legal jurisdictions. In Texas, child safety zones are designated as
“within 1,000 feet of premises including schools, day-care facilities,
playgrounds, public or private youth centers, public swimming pools, and video
arcade facilities, places where children generally gather.”
Maghelal and Olivares used the GIS process of geocoding to
locate all such facilities in Brazos
County, the jurisdiction
for which this system initially was developed; then they mapped the residences
of the 164 sex offenders registered there in spring 2005. Working with the City
of Bryan, which
posted this information to the Web, the two graduate students made the
resulting map available to both county law enforcement and the general public.
“Praveen and Miriam’s project was more than just a
database,” says Doug Wunneburger, the research scientist who taught the GIS
course for which it was developed. “Their analysis showed that a high
percentage of registered sex offenders live in locations that violate
restrictions against proximity to child safety zones. Their map allows members
of the public to use the work as a planning tool to determine if sex offenders
live near their homes or facilities used by their children. It can also help
parole officers and sex offenders identify areas to avoid in finding a place
for such offenders to live.”
But Maghelal and Olivares did not stop at simply mapping
where registered sex offenders live. They came up with a system for
categorizing risk to communities caused by the presence of sex offenders.
“Based on the nature of a sex offender’s offense, parole
boards assign a risk level of low, medium or high,” Maghelal explains. “Miriam
and I have created an analysis system by overlapping and categorizing an
individual offender’s area of risk with child safety zones, which helps law
enforcement gauge the cumulative risk to the community posed by individual
offenders.”
The students’ approach was a novel one and has been praised
by law enforcement officials.
“Prior to our study, no one had tried to understand the
dynamic effect of the presence of sex offenders on the community,” says
Olivares. “Most studies had been done from the perspective of the sex
offender’s location or of concentrations of multiple registered offenders. But
we looked at how to calculate for the community the accumulated threat based
upon where sex offenders live.”
The students’ class project has turned into quite an
enterprise. Olivares and Maghelal have presented papers about the project at
the National Institute of Justice’s Crime Mapping Research and ESRI
Conferences, at the Texas A&M Pathways Student Research Symposium, where it
was awarded first place for graduate research, and at the university’s Student
Research Week, where it also won first place for oral presentation. In
addition, the web-based service developed by the city of Bryan as a result of the student’s work has
received coverage on national television. Now, Maghelal and Olivares are hoping
to work with other communities to analyze the risk imposed due to the presence
of registered sex offenders.
“I think the most interesting aspect of Praveen and Miriam’s
GIS mapping and risk assessment methodology is its potential for evaluating the
benefits of the current law-making trend to mandate large child safety zones,”
notes Wunneburger.
“Can such practices help prevent sex crimes? If so, could similar methods be applied to prevent or limit impacts of other crimes, such as DWI offenses? These two students have already established their proficiency in addressing such questions.”
